The plan would dissolve the security services and threaten the country's own roadmap for ending the war, the commander of the Sudanese Armed Forces has said

The commander of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) has rejected a plan presented by the US to end the country's civil war, describing it as the "worst" proposal yet. 

In a statement published on Sunday, Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan said the proposal - presented through Massad Boulos, a senior adviser to US President Donald Trump on Arab and Middle Eastern affairs - would effectively abolish the armed forces' role, dissolve the security services, and leave the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in control of their current areas.

The Northeast African nation has been engulfed in a brutal conflict for more than two years.

Al-Burhan claimed that if the mediation continued along its current path, it would be seen as biased. The commander also accused the US envoy as speaking as if he wanted to impose conditions on the SAF, adding that "we fear that Massad Boulos will be an obstacle to the peace that all the people of Sudan seek."

The statement came shortly after Trump announced on Wednesday that he would personally join efforts to resolve the conflict. The US president stated that Washington, with his involvement, had already helped settle several global disputes, including between India and Pakistan.

On September 12, the 'Quartet' of the US, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt unveiled a proposal outlining a three-month humanitarian pause in Sudan, followed by a ceasefire, and a nine-month transition toward civilian rule.

Al-Burhan also stated that he had told Boulos that the proposal is "unacceptable," stressing the importance of adopting a roadmap put forward by the Sudanese government. "No one in Sudan will accept the presence of these rebels or their inclusion as part of any future solution," he added. 

READ MORE: Militia accuses Rubio of undermining truce

Sudanese Foreign Minister Muhieldin Salim has said Sudan is not officially working with the Quartet, arguing the group lacks an international mandate. The Quad mechanism "was not issued by a decision from the [UN] Security Council or any international organization," he noted, as quoted by the Sudan Tribune.